236 / 242
اﻟﻌﺪد
(12)
235
• Gimaret, Daniel, Les noms divins en Islam: Exégèse lexicographique et
théologique, Paris, Cerf, 1988.
• Gimaret, Daniel, La doctrine d’al-Ash
ʿ
ar
ī
, Paris, Cerf, 1990.
• Goldziher, Ignaz, Die Zahiriten, ihr Lehrsystem und ihre Geschichte:
Beitrag zur Geschichte der muhammedanischen Theologie, Leipzig, O.
Schulze, 1884.
• Graham, William, «Traditionalism in Islam: An Essay in Interpretation»,
The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 23.3, 1993, p. 495- 522.
• Guerrero, Rafael, «Aristotle and Ibn
Ḥ
azm. On the Logic of the Taqr
ī
b», in
Adang et al., op. cit, p. 403 -416.
• Gutas, Dimitri, Greek Thought, Arabic Culture, Londres, New York,
Routledge, 1998.
• Gutas, Dimitri, «Certainty, Doubt, Error: Comments on Epistemological
Foundations of Medieval Arabic Science», in Early Science and Medicine,
vol. 7, no. 3, Certainty, Doubt, Error: Aspects of the Practice of Pre- and
Early Modern Science, 2002, p. 276 -289.
• Gwynne, Rosalind, Logic, Rhetoric, and Legal Reasoning in the Qur’an:
God’s Arguments, London, New York, Routledge Curzon, 2004.
• Hourani, George, «Reason and Revelation in Ibn Hazm’s Ethical Thought»,
in Reason and Tradition in Islamic Ethics, Cambridge, Cambridge
University Press, 1984, p. 167 -189.
• Jambet, Christian, «Les malentendus de Ratisbonne: l’islam, la volonté et
l’intelligence», Esprit, novembre 2006, p. 10 -20.
• Ljamai, Abdelilah, Ibn
Ḥ
azm et la polémique islamo-chrétienne dans
l’histoire de l’islam, Leiden, Boston, Brill, 2003.
• Makdisi, George, «Ash
ʿ
ar
ī
and the Ash
ʿ
arites in Islamic Religious History»,
Studia Islamica 17, 1962, p. 37 -80.
• Makdisi, George, «Remarks on Traditionalism in Islamic Religious History»,
in Leiden, Carl (éd.), The Conflict of Traditionalism and Modernism in the
Muslim Modern Middle East, Austin, University of Texas, 1966, p. 77- 87.
ﺑﻘﻠﻢ: أدرﻳﺎن ﻛﻮﻧﺪﻳﺎر / ﺗﺮﺟﻤﺔ: ﻫﺪى ﻛﺮيمﲇ